H5N1 research censorship 'problematic'
Published: 2nd May 2012 18:01:25
The editor of the world-leading scientific journal Nature says current procedures to assess and censor medical research potentially of use to terrorists need to be improved.
Dr Philip Campbell made his remarks to BBC News following the publication of controversial research into the bird flu virus H5N1.
Two research papers have raised the concern of anti-terrorist agencies.
One was submitted to Nature; the other to another leading journal, Science.
The Science paper has yet to appear.
Both pieces of research show that the H5N1 virus can relatively easily mutate into a form that might spread rapidly among the human population.
The studies had prompted the US National Security Advisory Board for Biotechnology (NSABB) to ask both journals last November to take out some sensitive parts of the research that it believed could be used by terrorists to develop a bio-weapon.
Many in the scientific community, including the researchers concerned, argued that the benefits of publishing the research in full outweighed the risks.
The purpose of the work was to help those trying to develop a vaccine against the virus and to track the spread of the disease. Many also considered it a breach of academic freedom.
The NSABB urged that a way be found to make deleted material available to legitimate researchers.
How do you decide which researchers should get the sensitive information. And how can you realistically ensure that once it is in a University environment that it wont go further?”
Discussions mediated by the World Health Organization earlier this year, however, concluded that there was no practical way of doing this, at least on a reasonable timescale, and so both Journals decided to publish the research.
Speaking for the first time on the issue, Dr Campbell said that the current process for establishing whether medical research should be censored was "very, very problematic".
"If we are to go down the censorship route, how do you decide which researchers should get the sensitive information? And how can you realistically ensure that once it is in a university environment that it won't go further?"
He also believes that the NSABB was too hasty to recommend censorship of the research.
"The process was too closed. People were having conversations only by phone and there was insufficient consultation of the researchers and of other experts," Dr Campbell told me.
So what's the best way to handle such a situation if it ever crops up again?
Dr Campbell believes that the NSABB and the WHO should continue to play an important role, but also he says that it's the responsibility of journal editors such as himself to consult the views of the community and the security agencies.
"We have access to the very best advice in such circumstances. I would also be willing to consider a more formal and collective process," he said.
"I can't readily conceive of how that might work in practice, but I'm happy to do anything that makes science more trusted where dangerous organisms are concerned."
Follow Pallab on Twitter
At 04:44:44 in HeadlinesFrom the moment a gust of wind blew the skirt of the duchess up, to the smiling baby prince and the cheering fans, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have been treated like celebrities in New Zealand.
At 04:24:59 in HealthBowel cancer screening uptake needs to improve, campaigners say, after figures showed just over half of those eligible in England come forward for the test.
At 04:21:00 in HeadlinesThe European Parliament is voting on a bill to draw up a blacklist to fight invasive alien species such as killer shrimp and Japanese knotweed spreading.
At 04:16:11 in EnglandBefore being sent to the Western Front, thousands of new recruits were sent to a training camp to prepare them for trench warfare. However, campaigners now fear the remains of this World War One heritage face being irreparably damaged.
At 04:08:14 in EnglandMusic at a UB40 concert was so loud it was "altering heart rhythms" and caused a fan's ear to bleed, it has been claimed.
At 04:00:16 in HeadlinesParents will find out whether they have got their preferred primary school place, as for the first time a National Offer Day allocates places across England on the same day.
At 03:36:11 in BusinessChina's economy expanded by 7.4% in the first quarter of the year, better than what many were expecting.
At 02:55:07 in HeadlinesBirds can learn to choose the best building materials for their nests, according to scientists.
At 02:53:20 in HeadlinesA ferry with about 450 people on board is sinking off the south-west coast of South Korea, coastguard officials say.
At 02:28:43 in BusinessThe US has told China its currency must be allowed to rise if it and the global economy are to see stable growth.
Harvard CitationBBC News, 2012. H5N1 research censorship 'problematic' [Online] (Updated 2nd May 2012)
Available at: http://www.ukwirednews.com/news/1426117/H5N1-research-censorship-problematic [Accessed 16th Apr 2014]
News In Other Categories
Lewis Hamilton is driving as well as at any time in his career, according to Mercedes co-team boss Paddy Lowe.
Claims that Aberdeen City Council's administration broke the rules by including a pro-Better Together letter to council tax payers have been thrown out by an independent watchdog.
Fifty years ago this weekend, BBC Two went on the air for the first time. Or rather, it was supposed to go on the air. In fact, a massive power cut wiped out the entire launch schedule and led to one of the most disastrous nights in broadcasting history.
Before being sent to the Western Front, thousands of new recruits were sent to a training camp to prepare them for trench warfare. However, campaigners now fear the remains of this World War One heritage face being irreparably damaged.
Police have appealed for witnesses after two people were seriously injured in vehicle collisions.
There have been dramatic headlines about 3D technology, encompassing ideas to use 3D printers to make clothes, food, firearms and the parts of a house.